Your custom ad here across this site for just £40 monthly site-wide

THE LINK BETWEEN SHOW PRODUCT & VENUE..........

Home ] Up ] Encore - The Magazine ] Advertising Options ] Subcription Rates ] Listings ] Regular Columns ] Theatre Awards ] Talking Theatre ] The Roy Castle Fund ] The Encore Team ] Contact Us ] Links, Credits &  Notices ]

Article: 00002 back to the full list of articles
PANTONI'S VIEWS ON THE PANTOMIME DEBATE
(Following the previous article by ROY HUDD, Pantoni's DAVID LEE adds his thoughts on the subject)

It’s very rare I put pen to paper in response to an article, however I felt I just had to write a few words in respect of the superb pantomime article written by my dear friend and Past King Rat, Roy Hudd OBE.

It was quite eerie to read because Pantoni has been developing the precise writing policy for the genre for the past ten years. It all started following a conversation with Mr John White, the retired manager of the Octagon Theatre in Yeovil. John and I came to the same conclusions Roy so eloquently stated; in that there are very few performers being generated by television who have the experience required for appearance in pantomime. Moreover we were becoming even more concerned that too greater proportion of the budget was being allocated to the top of the bill/s and thus endangering the overall quality of the production itself. I realise of course that a No1 1500-2500 seat venue probably has a longer run, can charge a higher ticket price and therefore in such cases we must presume are able to turn in a healthy profit, even though, (if we are to believe everything we read in the nationals or hear on the grapevine?) star line up costs are probably enormous. I realise there is pressure from various quarters upon the pantomime producer to provide celebrities and that the criteria will vary enormously, but I have always asked myself; (1) Do we actually need all those names on a bill? (2) Could we generate better profits with less or in some cases no names at all? Can we by virtue of reducing celebrity costs improve the overall quality of the production as well as profit for producer and theatre?

I admit that we have been guilty over the years in engaging celebrities from soaps such as Neighbours, Home & Away and even Gladiators. However, Lucinda Cowden for instance, (Melanie from Neighbours) is a fine actress and is this year appearing as Peter Pan for us for the fifth time, and Natalie Imbruglia seems to have done well since she appeared as Snow White for us in Canterbury back in 1993.

It was also interesting to read Nick Smurthwaite’s interview with Howard Panter in The Stage and to note the engagement of American Stars such as Patrick Duffy and Henry Winkler. Does this casting policy tell us that celebrities for pantomime who can headline outright are thin on the ground? Ironically we approached Mr Duffy’s management back in the 90’s at the height the popularity of Dallas, there was considerable interest but unfortunately his filming commitments over December/January did not permit him to consider coming to the UK. Now we are in 2006 I do ask myself the question whether kids would know about ‘Dallas’ and the great part he played in it? Certainly adults will and of course they pay for the tickets.

This brings me to the main target of the pantomime audience, the children. Having been inspired as a child watching the wonderful productions at the Bradford Alhambra by the late King of Pantomime, Francis Laidler, in my view pantomime should be the faithful ‘on stage’ creation of the fairytale. Woe betide the producer who does not present the hen that actually lays golden eggs in Jack & The Beanstalk or omits to transform Cinderella’s rags into a beautiful ball gown within a flash! We all know how critically honest children can be!

And so what does the future hold? Roy refers to technology and there is no doubt that the digital age is going to create somewhat of a revolution in the way pantomime is presented. Digital projection is now a must and provides an opportunity to make transformations and enchantment even more spectacular. I sincerely believe that focus must, as Roy said, be on the book, but on original music too, something we feel is essential and now have over one hundred original pantomime songs in our library.

As for pantomime comedians; I consider myself very fortunate indeed to have worked with some of the masters of the art; Bernie Clifton, The Grumbleweeds, Billy Pearce, Little & Large and the genius the late Spike Milligan to name but a few.

As far as finding great comics for the future is concerned I was somewhat comforted at discovering a new seam of comedic talent who are highly experienced in communicating with the audience. Dick Whittington was right; “the streets of London are paved with gold”.  One of our comedians, Ben Langley, who started out as a Covent Garden street performer will this season appear for the fourth consecutive year at the Octagon Theatre in Yeovil. Last May Ben suggested I meet him in London to look at a street performer with a view to casting. I was most impressed and booked his friend for one of our productions, but I was also very surprised to find the wealth of other talent working that day. This is most certainly a location for potential new pantomime talent. After all such performers have to be excellent to survive, for they need to possess the know-how to attract their audience before they can even begin to entertain them! Now that’s public communication! Should I be revealing this source to our competitors? Why not? As Roy says; “we must protect the only entertainment that is truly part of our theatrical heritage.”

Of course pantomime will continue to embrace change, but as producers we must do our part to preserve the genre and the great routines of the past and pass them on to new purveyors of slapstick and mayhem and at the same time not loose sight of the essential elements that has made pantomime survive into the “Digital Age”; I believe they are Quality, Enchantment, Fun, and as always Good Value for money. That ticket price just has to be affordable and realistic. We pledge to do our bit Roy!

David Lee

article read Hit Counter times

Back ] Next ]

back to the full list of articles

Home ] Up ] Encore - The Magazine ] Advertising Options ] Subcription Rates ] Listings ] Regular Columns ] Theatre Awards ] Talking Theatre ] The Roy Castle Fund ] The Encore Team ] Contact Us ] Links, Credits &  Notices ]

© Encore Magazine 2006 all rights reserved                                                                                                                        Website by NETstyle graphics